Day 5: September 8
Something new at this year's fest - hired goons. Sure,
there have always been big security guys, but this year (at least in bigger
numbers) they're after something more elusive - those damn internet
pirates.
Shameful, those pirates.
The studios have moved in
highly powerful forensic equipment that does thermal and RF scanning to
determine if, during a screening, somebody's trying to tape the flick. It's
been pretty much those films you'd expect, the genre pics (like, say, the new
Alien cut) or big Hollywood releases (like Matchstick Men). Sure,
based on my examples it sounds like the technology is strictly used for Ridley
Scott films. That's not entirely inaccurate. Rumours persist that he's the only
one who insisted on the bank of rotating knives and the blood gutters in that
old folks' home they're building across the street.
Bit of a cock-up at
this MM when some jumpy studio rep started freaking that some people (say, me
and a couple others) were taping the intros and Q&A for Underworld.
I'd already discussed it with the main security guys, and it was all cool -
they were getting my battery for the duration of the film. I'm not an idiot,
they're trying to do their job, fair enough, and if you treat them with respect
all's good. That message didn't get through to the studio gorilla, however, as
he freaked on someone who was taping Kate Beckinsale et. al. as they
stumbled on the stage.
It all worked out, but the situation's obviously
a bit tense when this stuff goes on.
This was all aggravated by the
fact that the screening didn't start 'till about 1am - the previous Uptown
engagements had all run late. I was in for four consecutive screenings -
Dogville, with no "talent" showing up, went in and out smoothly.
"Talent", of course, is that lovely word used to describe anybody from the
actors from the film to their vapid entourage. There was a veritable mob for
Val Kilmer and friends for Wonderland which pushed the screening back a
half hour or so. Furthermore, for the 21 Grams screening they were 45
minutes late. The director of that film at least admitted he was drunk out of
his mind, having just come from their party. Who wants to leave the fun when
there are people waiting for you?
I sound harsh, but it was particularly
galling as there were a tonne of stars on hand just to stand there in the stage
when the film started. One minute, tops. No Q&A, no interaction, they stood
there, smiled and waved, and went and sat and watched their movie (or, in the
case of Kilmer, fucked off to a strip club). Exacerbating the situation at the
21 Grams screening, there were some 150 reserved seats blocked off,
meaning that some actual paid ticket holders had to sit in the aisles. From
what I could gather, some 40 of those seats were set aside for the "Hollywood
Foreign Press Association", those nefarious beings who get to decide on the
Golden Globes. It felt kinda spooky, like seeing the film with a roomful of
Masons or the Star Chamber guys or sumthin'.
All that said, this year it
really does seem like the organizers, volunteers and particularly the technical
and programming staff have been going out of their way to work cooperatively.
They've overcome quite a few challenges, both logistical and technical, and are
again to be commended. If only that attitude could get through to the fascist
ape freaking about taping Kate B's overly teased and hairsprayed noggin, it'd
all be good. Man, she looked like a hooker.
|
|
 |
Five Obstructions
Directed
by: Jørgen Leth and Lars von Trier
The conceit of this
documentary/film hybrid is simple: Jørgen Leth, one of von Trier's
cinematic heroes, made an experimental film called The Perfect Human in
the late 60s. von Trier wants Leth to remake his film with a number of given
"obstructions". The execution, however, is breathtaking, as the
theme-and-variation of the ideas of the original are teased and modified based
on von Trier's mad obstacles.
The film plays as if Leth is Faust to von
Trier's Mephistopholes, while each bargain or limitation in fact proves to be
the source of a new creative solution. Each solution is a remarkable
achievement, resulting in a wonderful moviegoing experience. Never to my mind
has the process of theme-and-variation for filmmakers been so cleverly and
compellingly presented.
Grade: A+
|
|
 |
Dogville
Directed by: Lars
von Trier
Dogville is a masterpiece. Many comparisons have
been made to Brecht plays, with their insistence on breaking down the barriers
of what we mean by theatrical presentation. For me, the film plays as a
minimalist, dark Barry Lyndon. With a lugubrious, world-weary narration
by John Hurt, witty title cards designating chapter stops, and an extended
period of time for the film to unfold, it reminded me of Kubrick's overlooked
period piece. Dogville is an exceptionally literary film that at the
same time employs extremely theatrical set design. Leave it to the mad genius
of Denmark to kick cinema's ass once again.
Grade: A+
|
|
 |
Wonderland
Directed by: James
Cox
Several years back, the doc Wadd played the MM screens. I
noted at the time that the only real flaw, ironically, was that it was just too
damn long. Now comes Wonderland, the latest vehicle post-Doors
for Val Kilmer to go crazy-like. I'm not sure how they did it, but the
filmmakers took a gruesome murder connected to the owner of the world's most
famous and girth-y "town tamer" and made the whole thing, well, boring. The
film is trying to be far more stylish than it needs to be, and employs
sophisticated narrative techniques (think Rashomon) that serve to
confuse the story rather than lift it beyond exploitational fluff. Bonus marks
for showing what Lisa Kudrow obviously really looks like without pounds of
pancake makeup attempting to keep her ageless on Friends. An A&E
Investigative Reports would have done the story far more justice than this
watered down silly film ever could.
Grade: C
|
|
 |
21 Grams
Directed by:
Alejandro González Iñárritu
Ah, clever editing.
"Look at me! I can put the ending in the middle!" While there are strong
performances in this intertwined tale from the likes of Benicio del Toro and
Sean Penn, it all feels forced, so "I'm acting for the camera and possible
Oscar recognition." Lots and lots of yelling and crying. Enough,
already.
The story never grabbed me, and the jumps in narrative time
seemed arbitrary, soon becoming a distressing obstacle rather than a narrative
lynchpin. Not as good as it wants to be.
Grade: C+
|
|
 |
Underworld
Directed by: Len
Wiseman
Mediocre Vampire/Werewolf (THERE wolf!) flick. Plastic
costumes, sets, and editing style. Ripping off everything from Matrix to
Queen of the Damned, a Play Station game would have done the look
better.
Did end up being fun playing "spot the colour" (red showed up
on the blue/grey palate about ten minutes in, and there was even some green!).
Boring, Hollywood fluff, lame fluff for even the most ardent genre
fans.
Grade: C-